Machine intelligence
Google is at the forefront of innovation in Machine Intelligence, with active research exploring virtually all aspects of machine learning, including deep learning and more classical algorithms. Exploring theory as well as application, much of our work on language, speech, translation, visual processing, ranking and prediction relies on Machine Intelligence. In all of those tasks and many others, we gather large volumes of direct or indirect evidence of relationships of interest, applying learning algorithms to understand and generalize.
Machine Intelligence at Google raises deep scientific and engineering challenges, allowing us to contribute to the broader academic research community through technical talks and publications in major conferences and journals. Contrary to much of current theory and practice, the statistics of the data we observe shifts rapidly, the features of interest change as well, and the volume of data often requires enormous computation capacity. When learning systems are placed at the core of interactive services in a fast changing and sometimes adversarial environment, combinations of techniques including deep learning and statistical models need to be combined with ideas from control and game theory.
Recent Publications
Preview abstract
Automating AI research differs from general software engineering due to computationally expensive evaluation (e.g., model training) and opaque performance attribution. Current LLM-based agents struggle here, often generating monolithic scripts that ignore execution costs and causal factors. We introduce MARS (Modular Agent with Reflective Search), a framework optimized for autonomous AI research. MARS relies on three pillars: (1) Budget-Aware Planning via cost-constrained Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to explicitly balance performance with execution expense; (2) Modular Construction, employing a "Design-Decompose-Implement" pipeline to manage complex research repositories; and (3) Comparative Reflective Memory, which addresses credit assignment by analyzing solution differences to distill high-signal insights. MARS achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source frameworks on MLE-Bench under comparable settings, maintaining competitiveness with the global leaderboard's top methods. Furthermore, the system exhibits qualitative "Aha!" moments, where 63% of all utilized lessons originate from cross-branch transfer, demonstrating that the agent effectively generalizes insights across search paths.
View details
VISTA: A Test-Time Self-Improving Video Generation Agent
Xuan Long Do
Hootan Nakhost
The IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (to appear) (2026)
Preview abstract
Despite rapid advances in text-to-video (T2V) synthesis, generated video quality remains critically dependent on precise user prompts. Existing test-time optimization methods, successful in other domains, struggle with the multi-faceted nature of video. To address this, we introduce VISTA, a novel multi-agent system that autonomously refines prompts to improve video generation. VISTA operates in an iterative loop, first decomposing a user's idea into a structured temporal plan. After generation, the best video is identified through a robust pairwise tournament. This winning video is then critiqued by a trio of specialized agents focusing on visual, audio, and contextual fidelity. Finally, a reasoning agent synthesizes this feedback to introspectively rewrite and enhance the prompt for the next generation cycle. To rigorously evaluate our proposed approach, we introduce MovieGen-Bench, a new benchmark of diverse single- and multi-scene video generation tasks. Experiments show that while prior methods yield inconsistent gains, VISTA consistently improves video quality, achieving up to 60% pairwise win rate against state-of-the-art baselines. Human evaluators concur, preferring VISTA's outputs in 68% of comparisons.
View details
The Ontic-Epistemic Distinction: Implications for General Intelligence
Master's Thesis (2026) (to appear)
Preview abstract
The current pursuit of robust machine intelligence is largely predicated on a substrate independent, computational functionalist view of cognition, where sufficiently complex computational processing is expected to eventually yield generalized reasoning. This paper explores the ontological distinctions between these computational frameworks and biological cognition, specifically how these differences impact the capacity for semantic understanding. By analyzing phenomena such as the "reversal curse" where models fail to generalize the symmetry in identity relations (A=B implies B=A), and performance on novel reasoning benchmarks (e.g., ARC-AGI), this paper examines whether current model limitations are transient artifacts of scale or indicative of a distinct architectural category. Integrating Stevan Harnad’s “symbol grounding problem” with Evan Thompson’s biological model of “intrinsic normativity,” I investigate whether robust general intelligence might require sense-making: a process distinct from information processing, whereby an agent’s internal states are causally coupled with its environment via survival or system-wide stakes which grounds symbols in meaning. Current Large Language Models (LLMs) appear to lack this intrinsic normativity, and consequently may operate primarily as epistemic instruments rather than ontic agents. By introducing the concept of “ontic grounding”, this paper presents a potential framework for distinguishing between the simulation of reasoning and true understanding, which could have implications for AI safety and governance.
View details
Preview abstract
Validating conversational artificial intelligence (AI) for regulated medical software applications may present challenges, as static test datasets and manual review may be limited in identifying emergent, conversational anomalies. A multi-agent AI system may be configured in a closed-loop for automated validation. The system can, for example, utilize an end user persona simulator agent to generate prompts for a target model and a domain /regulatory expert adjudicator agent to evaluate the target model’s responses against a configurable rubric. A meta-analysis agent can analyze anomalies to identify underlying vulnerabilities, which may then be used to programmatically synthesize new adversarial personas. This adaptive process can generate evidence to support regulatory compliance and continuous performance monitoring for medical software algorithms systems.
View details
Preview abstract
Optimizing large-language model (LLM) training and serving on large-sacle distributed systems with hundreds and thousands of accelerators is always a challenging task due to the fast evloving LLMs, strong domain expertise required, and various optimization goals from different worklaods. Existing methods rely on either handcrafted optimization performed by human experts, which is tedious and time-consuming or resource-intensive black-box searches, which lack the extensibility to keep pace with evolving models and hardware. To address this, we introduce PROMPTS, a novel multi-agent framework that complements traditional search methods with expert-informed reasoning. It automates the diagnosis of performance bottlenecks by synthesizing profiler data and leverages a knowledge base to propose optimized sharding configurations with detailed justifications.
Across eight real-world production workloads, PROMPTS demonstrated remarkable efficiency and accuracy, delivering performance improvements of up to 434%. These workloads spanned diverse model architectures, hardware platforms, computational scales, and various stages of the machine learning lifecycle (pre-training, serving, and post-training). In every case, the configuration adopted by human engineers was identified within the agent's top three proposals from a single invocation. Furthermore, the agent's top-ranked recommendation was the one ultimately adopted in 87.5% of cases, showcasing its ability to not only find optimized solutions, but also to correctly prioritize them. Our work establishes PROMPTS as a scalable, extensible, and explainable methodology for AI-assisted performance engineering in large-scale ML systems.
View details
Preview abstract
In large-scale distributed enterprises, traditional Knowledge Management (KM) systems face a critical failure mode: static documentation cannot keep pace with evolving operational realities and regional nuances. This "knowledge latency" forces employees out of self-service workflows and into costly support ticketing queues. This paper introduces SENTINEL, a geo-contextual AI framework designed to shift enterprise support from reactive retrieval to proactive interception. The architecture employs a novel dual-engine system integrated into an omni-present interface. The first engine utilizes Large Language Models (LLMs) to conduct pre-emptive, historical case-grounded audits of documentation, generating a "Contextual Density" score that identifies friction zones. The second engine is an autonomous Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) agent that surfaces in-situ via a location-intelligent assistant window, resolving queries in real-time. By functioning as a strategic "defensive barrier" at the point of origin, SENTINEL demonstrates how a proactive AI assistant can drive high-fidelity, in-situ case deflection.
View details
Some of our teams
×
![]()